Jeff Rense Has Been Married 5-10 Times
February 19, 2012
http://www.rense.com/
http://www.rense.com/general95/2jrcomm.html
Above, one slick dude
("Jeff Rense Steps in It" -Updated)
On Thursday Jeff Rense replied
to my article , "The Hidden Jeff Rense" without extending the common courtesy of linking to it. Of course, he vowed never to link to my site again, something he considers a trivial matter.
My crime? Posting a theory about Fukushima that challenged the official version which he accepts.
Jeff Rense is a liar. He has lied to me, his neighbor and many people close to him. Is this fact relevant to the "Truth" movement? Are we no better than the people we condemn?
Jeff has been married five times before 1983, i.e. age 38. He is 66. Extrapolating, he has been married as many as 10 times by now.
Ask Jeff Rense to reveal how many times he has been married.
Archives.com covers only 13 states and Oregon, his home state, is not one of them. 5-10 marriages. How's that for conservative family values? How's that for a personality problem?
--Aug. 8, 1969, Santa Barbara, CA: Jeffry S Rense and Janet S Andrew
--July 8, 1973, Santa Barbara, CA: Jeffry S Rense and Mary J Leimer
--March 20, 1977, Clark, NV: Jeffry Shearer Rense and Suezan Irene Errio
--June 2, 1979, Zephyr, NV: Jeffry Shearer Rense and Constance R Phillippe
--September 20, 1983, Reno, NV: Jeffry S Rense and Laura Hill
Like these marriages, our decade-long collaboration was terminated due to Jeff's personality issue. This is not personal. He is not dependable.
Here is an article that he posted which is similar the one about Jim Stone that caused him to cut me off.
Let's put Jeff Rense to the same standard as Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, Barrack Obama and Mitt Romney.
Jeff's cult following must know that their hero has a serious personality issue. I once rushed to his defense in his brawl with Mark Glenn. I was mistaken.
Now he is going ballistic against me for exposing his behavior. First he voted me off his island. Now, he is reading my eulogy, as though he were God.
Jeff Rense has two sides, the smooth-talking one we see, and the pompous megalomaniac that escapes without warning and wreaks havoc (mostly to himself but also to the Cause.) He does not deserve to have so much influence.
For years, Jeff Rense has dunned his readers for "donations" when he earned over $400K and wasted his money on childish extravagances. This is immoral.
This is not personal. Real issues are at stake.
I don't want to destroy JR or his site, even if I could. He is doing a lot of good by providing an audience for courageous people like Bro Kapner. I just want people to know who the real Jeff Rense is and why he can't be trusted. He betrayed my trust and eventually he will betray yours.
My readers have saved me the trouble of replying to his prevarications. Thank you!
EJ Wrote:
Geez Henry,
You REALLY hit a button with Jeff for sure. His long diatribe smelled of fear...
RENSE:
"As for the particular story about 'nuclear bombs' being used to cause the Fukushima quake and tsunami, I will not entertain such trash on my site."
So the question is what "trash" do you entertain Jeff? Over the past year alone I have followed youtube links to absolute rubbish that was commented on as such by numerous bloggers on youtube with a disdain for Rense's "trash" links and his credibility.
RENSE:
"... And frankly, after having essentially 'made' this man a vaguely 'popular' writer on the net, if anyone 'owed' anyone...well, let's just say the man has his priorities (and understanding) ass-backward."
god has spoken. :-/
RENSE:
"...and the quality of the majority of the 'contributor' articles had long since passed being of interest."
Yeah like social manipulation, Satanism, the whoring of our kids, etc., they are sooo boring compared to UFO's and endless Fukushima articles and links to the Mormon Mafia, etc.
RENSE:
"As I said, many of the 'contributor' articles I posted as a *personal favor* to this man did not measure up to my standards."
Thank you massa, I be getting back to the field now.
(left, some people never grow up)RENSE:
"Jeff Rense is controlling no one. He is a professional journalist, not a phony, shit-slinging fraud."
Well, there you have it Henry, and all he had to do is call in favors from "Anonymous" and Drockton, [both business partners -HM], and the such to turn you into the bad guy.
Damn shame. His "poor me as a single parent" thing was pretty good though. I could hear the violins playing on that one.
Jeff is definitely one slick dude Henry. I don't know his true ID or story even though, as I told you I tried to find out. Much like Jones and a few others, their gate keeping abilities are well-done, professional if you will.
Similar to the the Georgia Judge who found all of Orly Taiz's presentation "uncompelling" because it had too many real facts with which to deal, Jeff is doing the same thing with the nuking of Fukushima.
The mere fact he called it "trash" set off my neck hair meter. If he considers himself indeed some sort of "journalist" then, well, be one. Write a rebuttal to your linked article that would enlighten others rather then throw the baby out with the bath water sort of thinking.
These are the days of darkness Henry, and we must all stay strong to our highest beliefs that go beyond web popularity or ratings. As I said before, I may not always agree with you but I do respect the presentations of your ideas and philosophy. You appear to be a man confident and strong in his beliefs and desires to help civilize humans.
If Jeff had nothing to fear he would not have reacted so strongly and called in help from others. Stay on the trail my friend.
----------
Barbara wrote:
Henry,
Just a short note:
THANK YOU FOR OPENING OUR EYESAnuttama wrote:
I was sorry to hear that you were taken off Jeff Rense's site and was quite surprised about the reason. It didn't make sense that Jeff refused to consider the possibility that the Japan earthquake was anything other than a natural occurrence. While it probably was natural, any informed person would have to allow the possibility that it was man made. Jeff's reaction caused me to look more closely into his past behavior and I've unfortunately concluded that he probably is not what he seems. While he does have a good collection of links/articles, I now consider him to likely be the controlled opposition. Thanks for not backing down.
Wishing you the best,
Anuttama
www.billyandanuttama.
Michael wrote:
Since the first time I saw Mr. Rense's site I perceived him to be a man that is full of anger and hate-he points out some deceit in high places for sure, but he strikes me as a man that is interested in destroying the current order with no thought as to what would follow. There is rarely any positive or constructive ideas expressed on rense.com, even the design of the site exudes darkness and confusion. He may or may not have good intentions, but I feel his thoughts and actions are guided by the powers of darkness, the same powers he claims to fight against. If you hate men, Henry, you cannot love God, and if you do not love God then evil already has you.
BG wrote:
"The simple believes every word, but the wise considers his step." (Prov. 14:15-LITV)
...but too much paranoia about who's connected to who could drive a person batty.
It's funny now, as I eventually got over it & kept going forward (with eyes wide open). What other choice do we have? Shrink back? Not an option:
Thanks H,
/BG
PS: Tip re more exposure (minus Rense): Your readers can add your Twitter & website RSS links to their own Twitter feeds by using sites like "Deliver It" dlvr.it which will then *automatically* "re-tweet" all your headlines/links through their Twitter feeds (without anyone having to go manually "re-tweet" each "tweet" you post).
----
Kevin wrote:
I just now read over Jeff's '''reply''' to you, Henry, and what has me in stitches is this quote: "As I said, many of the 'contributor' articles I posted as a *personal favor* to this man did not measure up to my standards. My incoming reader email had been pointing in that same direction for a long time."
What a knee-slapper!
For anyone who hasn't tried, please, PLEASE try to send an email to Jeff Rense. Let him know whatever it is you want to let him know. And, if you are ever, EVER graced with a reply, please forward it for all to see..... because there is NO WAY to reach Rense UNLESS he reaches out to you first. I'd guess (though it may have been different 'back in the day' when Rense first began re-printing your articles, Henry, that he contacted YOU and not the other way around.
Rense's 'incoming reader email' is a big, fat joke because there is none.
Rich:Here's another few lines that require a laugh track:
Rense, when speaking of Mark Glenn writes: "I immediately informed the writer inciting same that unless he stopped with the hate and vitriol that was resulting in death threats and putting me and my family at severe risk, that I WOULD contact DHS and report his efforts to cause me grievous harm or worse."
Ah, so there he threatened to call the FEDS at HOMELAND SECURITY. Would ANY ''AWAKE'' AMERICAN CALL THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY FOR ANY REASON??
Rense's reply totally failed to address the two key points re his income vs pleas for donations OR his irrational stonewalling of . . Stone.
Just sent this, why do I doubt it'll get published? hmmm . . .
Hang in there friend, it'll be rough sailing for a while, but bottom line is, he IS purposely blocking the potentially most DEVASTATING unveiling of the Mossad/Illuminati possibility. This issue could literally bring them down at a HIGHLY CRITICAL juncture, just as they are trying desperately to justify and cojoin world forces against Iran . . so of course the suppression of Stone's material is high on their "to do" list, yes?
Rense rants, but totally fails to justify either his finances or his position on the matter [of donations.]
Joe:
Rense's response is so childish it's hard to believe it comes from a guy with the brainpower to run his site. So maybe he's acting, or maybe he doesn't really run his site. All Rense had to do was calmly deny a list of individual facts, and speculate that someone had fed you false information or was twisting your arm.
The Illuminati or whoever they are, wouldn't bother to coerce you to attack Jeff Rense. If they were coercing you, they'd coerce you to take down you site altogether, and maybe throw you in jail to boot. So I think you attacked Rense because you had the same bad feeling about him that I have had, and maybe were fed false and irrelevant information to bait you into a "Pickett's charge" that would reduce your credibility.
Anyway that's my guess.
Keep up the good work, wrestling our women out of the clutches of the Illuminati!
.......................................................................................................
Obadiah Chapter 1 עֹבַדְיָה
